"Love
and marriage go together like a horse and carriage.” Sammy Cahn
Young people used to think that if
they found a person who will love them unconditionally, treat them like a
princess or prince, and give gifts to them is the one that is compatible to
them, the person they will fall in love with and they cannot imagine living the
rest of their life without that person. So, they will marry that person and
have children. This maybe an idealistic perspective of a person about marriage
but this is based on media, observation and stories.
When
two people used to get along very well to each other and have this so called
spark between them is describe having a good chemistry which is the concept of
chemistry as it applies to relationships. In Goethe 1809 novel, “Elective Affinities,”
he further developed the idea of interpersonal chemistry, where he metaphorically
compared the process of attraction between two people to a chemical reaction. In
addition, recent neurological studies, such as Michael Liebowitz’s “The Chemistry
of Love” (1983), have been able to describe the actual chemical processes that
occur in the human body when a person is experiencing love. However, the
understanding of the biological mechanisms that allow men and women to live are
merely the starting point for understanding the human experience.
Love
as a cultural and social phenomenon can be perceived as one of the mechanisms
human beings use in order to organize their world. Love is one of the processes
through which human beings become attracted to one another, and in one of the way
we have become accustomed to doing it in modern times, we seek a single partner
with whom to fall in love with. For the purpose of forming a family, therefore,
love may be one of the ways we use to select someone to have children with. Historically,
however, mates have not often been chosen on the basis of love but rather—as
previously noted—on the basis of convenience; at times mates are selected by
the parents or families of the individuals to be married.
Love
aims at and assists in the adjustment to frustrating experiences. To measure
its effect on marriage it must be judged in its true form and not in poor
falsifications. Seen in proper perspective, it has not only done no harm as a
prerequisite to marriage, but it has mitigated the impact that a too-
fast-moving and unorganized conversion to new socio- economic constellations
has had upon our whole culture and it has saved monogamous marriage from
complete disorganization.(Beigel 333)
Fowler, Ana Carolina (2007) "Love and Marriage: Through the
Lens of Sociological Theories," Human
Architecture: Journal of theSociology of Self-Knowledge: Vol. 5: Iss. 2, Article 6. Retrieved March 30, 2012 from
http://scholarworks.umb.edu/humanarchitecture/vol5/iss2/6
Group 2
Anna Mae Alamag
Jeska Nicole Cabiles
Dally Delos Santos
Rensea Mae De Vera
Isabella Herreria
Feby Andrea Laroco
Danna Ruiz
No comments:
Post a Comment